Our Plan Worked: My Meeting With Peter Roskam

Last week, we got our Daylight Savings-tired selves out of bed super early, braved the snow and cold weather and went to pay our friend Peter Roskam a surprise visit at the Glen Ellyn Civic Center, where he was having a private meeting. Three friends and I had been planning this for a few weeks, mainly by text, sometimes over margaritas. And guess what? Our plans worked: a couple of us actually got to meet and discuss policy with Peter Roskam, privately.

How did this happen, you ask? How did we manage what so many others could not? We planned, we were polite, we persisted. There were about 50 of us gathered at the Civic Center that morning, and after they realized we weren’t going to go away, his aides came out and said he would meet with two or three of us. We were floored but we hid it well. We decided it would be myself and Jen, and since Emily had to take her kids to school, and Lisa was out of town for this meeting, Walt, another local political activist joined us.

I engaged my strategy of “fake it till you make it” which, so far, has gotten me through some awkward situations in life: on the outside, I look calm and professional, and just never-you-mind the nervous voices in my head.

The reason Peter and his staff decided to meet with us was for political reasons: the media was there and he couldn’t be seen dodging his constituents yet again. So Peter used our meeting to assuage CBS News that he was totally meeting with his constituents! See? What’s all the fuss about, anyway? He’s totally not just running away at the mere sight of protestors!

What did we talk about, you ask? I asked about his lock-step voting with Trump even though the majority of his constituents voted for Hillary Clinton, while Jen asked him about his insistent support for the repeal and replace of the Affordable Care Act.

What was he like, you ask? He seemed to have a simmering-just-below-the-surface annoyance because he had to actually sit down with us and answer questions. It was clear from his demeanor that he thinks you’re either with him or against him; if you’re not on his team, he doesn’t owe you anything, even though he’s your congressional representative.

I started by asking him why he voted against making Trump release his tax returns. He said it would be “opening a Pandora’s box” to make him release his taxes: “what would stop the IRS from asking to see your taxes?” he asked me.

First of all, I said, I wouldn’t mind, since I have nothing to hide.

Second of all, Donald Trump is not exactly a regular ole private citizen, he is the President of the United States.

And third of all, of all the possible “Pandora’s Box” situations that are being unleashed by the current administration, he sure picked a weird one to be concerned about. I asked him, “Why don’t you concern yourself with the fact that people with brown skin are being asked to show proof of citizenship? Or how about the Pandora’s Box that’s been opened with refugees being deported due to these new draconian immigration guidelines? To pick this IRS issue as your moment to stand up for citizens seems a strange choice.”

“And besides, you don’t want to align yourself with Donald Trump. You know he’s out there where the buses don’t run,” I said, earning a guffaw from his aide. “You should be doing what your constituents want, not what that lunatic wants.”

I asked him if he would support an investigation into Trump’s Russian ties and he said he already did by voting to investigate. I asked if he would change his position on this and he said no. I asked if he would vote to block legislation looking into this in the future and he said no. We’ll see if he keeps his word on that.

When I told him he wasn’t representing the people of the 6th District properly, he asked me, “Then why do they keep voting for me? Why do I keep winning elections?”

He sure does keep winning elections: this is his sixth congressional term. But I had an answer for that.

“It’s because people in this community love to support our own,” I explained. “Because all it took in the past was for someone to say, ‘Hey, I was in math class with him in seventh grade, he’s a good guy!’ in order to get a vote for you. The fact that you went to Ben Franklin and Glenbard West was enough to make you a Hometown Hero, which helped you win these elections. People want to think of you as a good guy, they want you to be successful and that was all it took.”

“But now,” I said, “things are different. The political landscape has changed. Before this last election, most people had the luxury of being asleep behind the wheel. Most voters are largely uninformed on policy.”

Peter Roskam said “I would agree with that.” In other words: he knows people don’t research candidates and dig deep— and he relies on that type of head-in-the-sand approach to win elections.

“But since this monster won the White House,” I said, “everyone has woken up. Now, suddenly, they’re interested in policy. They want to know where you stand. They want to know how you vote.”

“We have to look up online to see how you vote, since you never discuss it publicly,” said Jen.

“That’s right,” I continued. “You have refused to debate any of your opponents in all these past elections. You have refused to answer questions from your constituents. You have refused to hold Town hall Meetings. You are still trying to get by on the Hometown Hero persona and that simply won’t work anymore. Now, we are watching how you vote, who you align yourself with, what you say. Your next election will be different.”

Walt kept telling Peter that it was utterly unconscionable that nearly 16,000 of his constituents would lose their insurance if the ACA were repealed. Peter responded by saying, “Well, it should soothe your conscience to know that the new plan will be better.”

“With all due respect, it isn’t our conscience that we’re worried about,” I told him. He didn’t like that. He went on to tell us several stories about meeting constituents who came into his office, crying, because of an issue they had with Obamacare.

“One woman sat in my office and cried, because she was going to have to change doctors while in the middle of treatment for breast cancer,” he said. After listening to a few more similar examples, I spoke up.

“That is anecdotal evidence that you’re using to support repealing the ACA. None of what you’re describing is actual data,” I said.

“That is not anecdotal! Those are real people wth real problems,” he thundered. He was really angered by my assertion and I was really puzzled by his defensiveness because…isn’t that the very definition of anecdotal? I’m not a good poker player and I’m sure my face showed my incredulousness. But before I could offer up my own personal anecdotes about my friends who will be negatively impacted by the Republican health care plan, he stood up to indicate an end to our meeting.

“Trust me,” he said. “I know plenty of conservatives who are losing their minds over the first round of Trump care. We’re working on it.”

“Trust me,” I said, “we see conservatives losing their minds over all sorts of things these days.”

“Good one,” he said. “Really, that’s a good one.” He even smiled at me.

I smiled back and said, “thank you, I’ll be here all week!”

The three of us ended up speaking with Peter for about twenty minutes. As he himself told CBS news, “I felt it was a highly productive, good discussion.” We were polite, we were respectful but we were firm. He was also polite and respectful. I would like to try and reach out to him again (his aide assured us that Peter would like to meet again as well) to try and find some middle ground in order to make the rest of his term productive; after all, there are twenty months until the next election.

I was not intimidated by him. I had no trouble speaking extemporaneously on several issues. I think he was surprised to be firmly interrupted and rebutted by a Mom in a parka, leopard-print winter hat and furry snow boots, but like I said, there’s a new political landscape and he’d best start getting used to it— and to us, his constituents.

5 Comments
  1. Nancy Holst 9 months ago

    I’m a member of the the Action 6th District. Thank you for “representing” on behalf of all of us. What an amazing conversation. I’m surprised you were able to express as much as you did. Of course, as you said, with the media present, he could hardly refuse. I really wonder if he actually believes the “the new plan will be better”? And, thank you for giving such a concise report as to how the conversation went. Nice Job!

  2. John 9 months ago

    So one question: When can I sign your nominating petition?

  3. Terry Heffron 8 months ago

    Thank you for sharing! I am an active senior in an independent retirement community of 600 Dist. 6 constituents in Oakbrook. I am intensely interested in Social Security and health care issues as well as those you mentioned. Roskam’s record on senior issues is deplorable. I met him 2 years ago and his dismissal of constituents not on board with him is exactly as you describe. Also true: too many people are uninformed and don’t do their research How can I join your group and work for a change? I’m also looking for input on challengers in the race. And activities I can participate in. Thank you

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


*

CONTACT ME

I look forward to hearing from you!

Sending

©2017 And In High Heels

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?